Can and should means-ends reasoning be used in teaching?

Studies in Philosophy and Education 5 (4):375-406 (1967)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,458

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reply to James E. McClellan.Philip G. Smith - 1965 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 4 (1):75.
Reply to James E. McClellan.Byron G. Massialas - 1972 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 7 (4):341.
Reply to James E. McClellan.Carl Bereiter - 1975 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 9 (1):16.
Response to James E. McClellan.Tapio Puolimatka - 1997 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 16 (4):401-406.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-08-28

Downloads
41 (#548,119)

6 months
7 (#715,360)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Unsuccessful teaching.W. F. Hare - 1969 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 1 (2):53–59.
Curriculum aims and objectives: Taking a means to an end.Hugh Sockett - 1972 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 6 (1):30–61.
The concept of physical education II.Mollie Adams - 1969 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 3 (1):23–35.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references