Appius Claudius Caecus and the Via Appia

Classical Quarterly 30 (02):356- (1980)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to reconsider the principal lines of approach which have been taken to the career of Appius Claudius Caecus in the hope of formulating a view of the censor which is neither over-dramatized nor, on the other hand, so muted as to deny recognition to those aspects of his political behaviou which so greatly exercised his contemporaries. In so doing, I will argue that previous studies of Appius' career have sought in the wrong places for an explanation of the political rivalry between him and his opponents and I will offer an interpretation of his censorial acts—and of one of them in particular—which, I believe, may account for this rivalry

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,757

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

8. Römische Beredsamkeit von Appius Claudius bis zu Seneca d. Ä.Thomas Baier - 2019 - In Christian Tornau & Michael Erler (eds.), Handbuch Antike Rhetorik. De Gruyter. pp. 249-270.
Spinoza on miracles.Graeme Hunter - 2004 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 56 (1):41 - 51.
Commonwealth and Civility: A Study of Thomas Hobbes.Brian Frederick Stoffell - 1985 - Dissertation, The University of British Columbia (Canada)
The Metaphysics of Freedom.Fred Dretske - 1992 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 22 (1):1-13.
John Buridan on the Possibility of Defining Definition.Rodrigo Guerizoli - 2017 - History and Philosophy of Logic 38 (3):201-209.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-09

Downloads
24 (#918,365)

6 months
10 (#427,773)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

La Republique romaine.G. Bloch - 1915 - American Journal of Philology 36 (2):212.

Add more references