Back from Beyond

Environmental Values 7 (2):193 - 197 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

To take the idea of a non-anthropocentric ethic of nature seriously is to abandon morality itself. The idea of humanity is not an optional extra for moral seriousness. Non-anthropocentric environmental ethicists mistake the kind of value non-human entities may bear. It is not moral value, but aesthetic value.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,505

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Non-Anthropocentrism? A Killing Objection.Tony Lynch & David Wells - 1998 - Environmental Values 7 (2):151-163.
Beyond Human Racism.Robyn Eckersley - 1998 - Environmental Values 7 (2):165-182.
Anthropocentrism.Allen Thompson - 2015 - In Stephen Mark Gardiner & Allen Thompson (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Environmental Ethics. Oxford University Press USA.
The anthropocentric advantage? Environmental ethics and climate change policy.Nicole Hassoun - 2011 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (2):235-257.
Non-Anthropocentric Value Theory and Environmental Ethics.J. Baird Callicott - 1984 - American Philosophical Quarterly 21 (4):299 - 309.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-29

Downloads
26 (#855,855)

6 months
9 (#495,347)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Animal ethics and interest conflicts.Elisa Aaltola - 2005 - Ethics and the Environment 10 (1):19-48.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references