The Universe Didn't Begin Uncaused: A New Argument for the Kalām Causal Principle

Faith and Philosophy (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The causal principle of the Kalām cosmological argument—Everything that begins to exist has a cause—remains controversial. One common objection is that while the principle may apply to things within the universe, it does not apply to the universe itself. Here, I argue that if the universe began uncaused, then there is an extremely high probability that the universe began just moments ago with the appearance of age. However, I further argue that the general agreement of independent estimates for the universe’s age provides powerful empirical evidence that if the universe began to exist, then the universe has a cause.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Kalam Cosmological Argument, Volume Two: Scientific Evidence for the Beginning of the Universe.William Lane Craig & Paul Copan (eds.) - 2017 - New York: Bloomsbury Academic, an imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing (2017).
Deny the Kalam’s Causal Principle, Embrace Absurdity.Rad Miksa - 2020 - Philosophia Christi 22 (2):239-255.
The Beginning of Existence.David Simon Oderberg - 2003 - International Philosophical Quarterly 43 (2):145-157.
Craig’s God Cannot Create a Temporal Universe.Erik J. Wielenberg - 2021 - Philosophia Christi 23 (2):329-340.
Kalam: A swift argument from origins to first cause?John Taylor - 1997 - Religious Studies 33 (2):167-179.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-12-17

Downloads
390 (#72,053)

6 months
390 (#4,370)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Lu
Stanford University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references