Modern Infinitesimals as a Tool to Match Intuitive and Formal Reasoning in Analysis: Dedicated to the Memory of G. Reeb and J. L. Callot [Book Review]

&
Synthese 134 (1/2):325 - 351 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We discuss various ways, which have been plainly justified in the second half of the twentieth century, to introduce infinitesimals, and we consider the new style of reasoning in mathematical analysis that they allow

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,795

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Modern infinitesimals as a tool to match intuitive and formal reasoning in analysis.Robert Lutz & Luis Gonzaga Luis Gonzaga - 2003 - Synthese 134 (1-2):325 - 351.
Modern Infinitesimals as a Tool to Match Intuitive and Formal Reasoning in Analysis.Robert Lutz & Luis Luis Gonzaga - 2003 - Synthese 134 (1-2):325-351.
Leibniz’s Infinitesimals: Their Fictionality, Their Modern Implementations, and Their Foes from Berkeley to Russell and Beyond. [REVIEW]Mikhail G. Katz & David Sherry - 2013 - Erkenntnis 78 (3):571-625.
Cantor on Infinitesimals. Historical and Modern Perspective.Piotr Błaszczyk & Marlena Fila - 2020 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic 49 (2).
Infinitesimals: A Defense.Stacey Lynn Edgar - 1982 - Dissertation, Syracuse University
Toward a History of Mathematics Focused on Procedures.Piotr Błaszczyk, Vladimir Kanovei, Karin U. Katz, Mikhail G. Katz, Semen S. Kutateladze & David Sherry - 2017 - Foundations of Science 22 (4):763-783.
Gist another panacea? Or just the illusion of inclusion.Mark L. Howe & F. Michael Rabinowitz - 1991 - Developmental Review 11 (4):305-316.
Infinitesimals as an issue of neo-Kantian philosophy of science.Thomas Mormann & Mikhail Katz - 2013 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science (2):236-280.
Axioms for Non-Archimedean Probability (NAP).Vieri Benci, Leon Horsten & Sylvia Wenmackers - 2012 - In De Vuyst J. & Demey L. (eds.), Future Directions for Logic; Proceedings of PhDs in Logic III - Vol. 2 of IfColog Proceedings. College Publications.
Reverse formalism 16.Sam Sanders - 2020 - Synthese 197 (2):497-544.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-30

Downloads
28 (#807,648)

6 months
2 (#1,693,059)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Grammar and sets.B. H. Slater - 2006 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (1):59 – 73.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references