How to solve the distinguishability problem: Triangulation without explicit training

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1142-1143 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Heyes's (1998) triangulation approach to distinguishing a “theory” of mind (ToM) from a “theory” of behavior (ToB) in chimpanzees fails. The ToB theorist can appeal to the explicit training sessions and analogical reasoning to explain/predict the chimpanzees' behaviors. An alternative triangulation experiment is sketched, demonstrating how the removal of such training sessions paves the way toward solving the distinguishability problem.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,795

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Triangulation Triangulated.Kirk Ludwig - 2011 - In Cristina Amoretti & Gerhard Preyer (eds.), Triangulation: from an epistemological point of view. pp. 69-95.
Peer review: Explicit criteria and training can help.Fred Delcomyn - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):144-144.
Language Learning in Wittgenstein and Davidson.Ben Kotzee - 2013 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 33 (4):413-431.
Chimpanzee mind reading: Don't stop believing.Kristin Andrews - 2017 - Philosophy Compass 12 (1):e12394.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
56 (#388,324)

6 months
19 (#157,526)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Robert Lurz
Brooklyn College

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references