DTC Advertising Harms Patients and Should Be Tightly Regulated

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 37 (3):444-450 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Like all interventions in health care, direct-to-consumer advertising should be evaluated by comparing its risks to its benefits, in the context of the available or potentially available alternatives. The objective, of course, is to realize any unique benefits while minimizing the risks. On balance, the adverse effects of DTC advertising outweigh the still-undemonstrated benefits of the advertising.DTC advertising must be seen in the context of overall pharmaceutical company expenditures on advertising. In 2005, the industry spent $29.9 billion dollars on promotions, of which a relatively small fraction, $4.2 billion, was spent on DTC advertising. The percentage spent on DTC advertising has been relatively constant this decade. Promotions to professionals and samples accounted for far larger percentages of total promotional spending in 2005.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,830

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Impact of advertising: End user perspective.Masroor MasKhanam & Akbar Ali - 2019 - Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 58 (1):179-189.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
78 (#266,903)

6 months
12 (#282,714)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Engineering Medical Decisions.Meredith Stark & Joseph J. Fins - 2013 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 22 (4):373-381.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references