Overdetermined problems in science

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 9 (1):1-18 (1978)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to draw attention to a pattern of development, the significance of which has not been generally recognized. This pattern is characterized by an initial occurrence of what I shall call an overdetermined problem - i.e. a problem with no solution compatible with accepted belief and practice - followed by a resolution of the problem which relies on and exploits a change in what was previously taken as given.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
283 (#96,522)

6 months
76 (#80,574)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The process of discovery.Andrew Lugg - 1985 - Philosophy of Science 52 (2):207-220.
What are problems?Hakob Barseghyan, Paul Patton, Guillaume Dechauffour & Carlin Henikoff - 2024 - Philosophical Studies 181 (10):2755-2777.
Theory choice and resistance to change.Andrew Lugg - 1980 - Philosophy of Science 47 (2):227-243.
The Truthiness about Hurricane Catastrophe Models.Roger Pielke & Jessica Weinkle - 2017 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 42 (4):547-576.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas Samuel Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Otto Neurath.
Philosophy of natural science.Carl Gustav Hempel - 1966 - Englewood Cliffs, N.J.,: Prentice-Hall.
Conjectures and Refutations.K. Popper - 1962 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 21 (3):431-434.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.David Bohm - 1964 - Philosophical Quarterly 14 (57):377-379.

View all 15 references / Add more references