Exposition and Obligation: A Serresian Account of Moral Sensitivity

Symposium 18 (1):176-193 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In The Troubadour of Knowledge, Michel Serres demonstrates, by means of an extended discussion of learning, that our capacity to adopt a position presupposes a kind of disorienting exposure to a dimension of pure possibility that both subtends and destabilizes that position. In this paper I trace out the implications of this insight for our understanding of obligation, especially as it is articulated in the moral philosophy of Immanuel Kant. Specifically, I argue that obligation is given along with a dimension of moral possibility, and not, as Kant thought, as an unmediated fact of reason.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

A Fact, As It Were: Obligation, Indifference, and the Question of Ethics.Bryan Lueck - 2016 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 21 (1):219-234.
Obligation and the Fact of Sense.Bryan Lueck - 2019 - Edinburgh University Press.
Thinking Outside the Circle: The Place of Kierkegaard in Stern's Understanding Moral Obligation.William Bristow - 2012 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 55 (6):606-621.
Kant's fact of reason as source of normativity.Bryan Lueck - 2009 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 52 (6):596 – 608.
Normativity and reason.Thomas Pink - 2007 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 4 (3):406-431.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-04-04

Downloads
481 (#62,603)

6 months
104 (#60,041)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bryan Lueck
Southern Illinois University Edwardsville

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references