- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Bayesian generic priors for causal learning
Psychological Review 115 (4):955-984 (2008)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Modeling Causal Learning Using Bayesian Generic Priors on Generative and Preventive Powers.W. Cheng Patricia, J. Holyoak Keith, Liljeholm Mimi, Lu Hongjing & Yuille Alan - unknown
Review: The Common Thread of Induction. [REVIEW]Peter C.-H. Cheng - 1991 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42 (2):269 - 272.
The meaning and computation of causal power: Comment on Cheng (1997) and Novick and Cheng (2004).Christian C. Luhmann & Woo-Kyoung Ahn - 2005 - Psychological Review 112 (3):685-692.
The Bayesian sampler: Generic Bayesian inference causes incoherence in human probability judgments.Jian-Qiao Zhu, Adam N. Sanborn & Nick Chater - 2020 - Psychological Review 127 (5):719-748.
Is causal induction based on causal power? Critique of Cheng (1997).Klaus Lober & David R. Shanks - 2000 - Psychological Review 107 (1):195-212.
The power PC theory and causal powers: Comment on Cheng (1997) and Novick and Cheng (2004).Peter A. White - 2005 - Psychological Review 112 (3):675-682.
Maybe this old dinosaur isn’t extinct: What does Bayesian modeling add to associationism?Irina Baetu, Itxaso Barberia, Robin A. Murphy & A. G. Baker - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (4):190-191.
Online learning in sequential Bayesian persuasion: Handling unknown priors.Martino Bernasconi, Matteo Castiglioni, Alberto Marchesi, Nicola Gatti & Francesco Trovò - 2025 - Artificial Intelligence 338 (C):104245.
The Oxford Handbook of Causal Reasoning.Michael Waldmann (ed.) - 2017 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Tao Hongjing ping zhuan: fu Kou Qianzhi, Lu Xiujing ping zhuan.Guofa Zhong - 2005 - Nanjing Shi: Nanjing da xue chu ban she.
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-06-30
Downloads
71 (#292,238)
6 months
14 (#215,666)
2016-06-30
Downloads
71 (#292,238)
6 months
14 (#215,666)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
A tutorial introduction to Bayesian models of cognitive development.Amy Perfors, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, Thomas L. Griffiths & Fei Xu - 2011 - Cognition 120 (3):302-321.
Learning a theory of causality.Noah D. Goodman, Tomer D. Ullman & Joshua B. Tenenbaum - 2011 - Psychological Review 118 (1):110-119.
References found in this work
Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World.Wesley C. Salmon - 1984 - Princeton University Press.
Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference.Judea Pearl - 1988 - Morgan Kaufmann.
Models and Analogies in Science.Mary B. Hesse - 1963 - [Notre Dame, Ind.]: University of Notre Dame Press.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6b8b7fc7ff-qzffw uwo