In defense of individualistic empiricism: A reply to messrs. Lovejoy and Hook

Journal of Philosophy 49 (4):100-111 (1952)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

0022362X

DOI

10.2307/2021579

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,337

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

In defense of individualistic empiricism: Rejoinder to mr. Lowe.Arthur O. Lovejoy - 1952 - Journal of Philosophy 49 (4):111-112.
In Defense of Individualistic Empiricism.Victor Lowe - 1952 - Journal of Philosophy 49 (4):111-112.
Plantinga on the free will defense: A reply.Nelson C. Pike - 1966 - Journal of Philosophy 63 (4):93-104.
Ethical empiricism and moral heteronomy: A reply.Frank Chapman Sharp - 1941 - Philosophical Review 50 (1):60-64.
Messrs. Schlick and Ayer on immortality.Virgil C. Aldrich - 1938 - Philosophical Review 47 (2):209-213.
In reply to a defense of skepticism.James Cargile - 1972 - Philosophical Review 81 (2):229-236.
In Defense of a Different Taxonomy: A Reply to Owens.Valerie Walker - 1990 - Philosophical Review 99 (3):425 - 431.
Pragmatic Naturalism: The Philosophy of Sidney Hook.Paul Kurtz - 1990 - Journal of Philosophy 87 (10):526-534.
Hook, Dewey, and Marx.Nicholas Capaldi - 1990 - Journal of Philosophy 87 (10):535-536.
The relativity paradoxes: A footnote to the Lovejoy-Mcgilvary controversy.Nathaniel H. Stevens - 1938 - Philosophical Review 47 (6):624-638.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
30 (#751,717)

6 months
7 (#710,381)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references