What Do These Words Encode?

Constructivist Foundations 15 (2):142-144 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Open peer commentary on the article “A Critique of Barbieri’s Code Biology” by Alexander V. Kravchenko.: To talk of “code biology” is to change the meaning of the word code in a way that would be impossible if code were a unit of a code, i.e., encoded some fixed meaning. Code biology is in that respect and to that extent a self-refuting linguistic construct dependent on an understanding of language whose contradiction is implicit in the very existence of code biology.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,458

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Immateriality of Meaning.Claudio Julio Rodríguez Higuera - 2019 - Constructivist Foundations 15 (2):140-141.
Living and Languaging Are Self-Fabrication.Stephen J. Cowley - 2019 - Constructivist Foundations 15 (2):135-137.
Codes: Necessary, but not Sufficient for Meaning-Making.Kalevi Kull - 2019 - Constructivist Foundations 15 (2):137-139.
Levels of Interpretation of Signs.Alexei A. Sharov - 2019 - Constructivist Foundations 15 (2):147-148.
From Code Biology to Cybersemiotics: Levels of Semiosis.Carlos Vidales - 2019 - Constructivist Foundations 15 (2):144-147.
Reflections on Languaging.Pille Bunnell - 2019 - Constructivist Foundations 15 (2):152-155.
On Life-Language Continuity.Elena Clare Cuffari - 2019 - Constructivist Foundations 15 (2):149-151.
In Defense of Biosemiotics.Peter Cariani - 2019 - Constructivist Foundations 15 (2):155-158.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-08-12

Downloads
7 (#1,638,362)

6 months
4 (#1,249,987)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references