The Aristotelian Arche-Decisions and the Challenge of Perishing

Filozofija I Društvo 31 (2):194-219 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper deals with Aristotle’s concept of corruption. First, it reconstructs Aristotle’s debate with the pre-Socratics and then it focuses on the candidates for entity that can perish: form, matter, and substance. The text argues against the widely accepted thesis according to which substance is a corruptio simpliciter without further ado. The paper intensely relies upon ancient and medieval commentators of Aristotle. Finally, special attention is devoted to the dimension of time and the problem of actuality.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,211

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Substancehood and Subjecthood in Z-H.Marco Zingano - 2022 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 104 (2):266-289.
Time Matter and Form: Essays on Aristotles Physics.David Bostock - 2006 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK.
First Philosophy in Aristotle.Mary Louise Gill - 2018 - In Sean D. Kirkland & Eric Sanday, A Companion to Ancient Philosophy. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press. pp. 347–373.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-29

Downloads
27 (#916,159)

6 months
11 (#332,542)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Metaphysics: A Contemporary Introduction.Michael J. Loux & Thomas M. Crisp - 1997 - New York: Routledge. Edited by Thomas M. Crisp.
A Study of Spinoza's Ethics.Jonathan Bennett - 1984 - Cambridge University Press.
Three Versions of the Bundle Theory.James Van Cleve - 1985 - Philosophical Studies 47 (1):95 - 107.

View all 26 references / Add more references