- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The fate of knowledge in social theories of science
In Frederick F. Schmitt (ed.), Socializing Epistemology: The Social Dimensions of Knowledge. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 135--158 (1994)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Socializing epistemology: An introduction through two sample issues.Frederick Schmitt - 1994 - In Frederick F. Schmitt (ed.), Socializing Epistemology: The Social Dimensions of Knowledge. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 1--28.
A conservative approach to social epistemology.Hilary Kornblith - 1994 - In Frederick F. Schmitt (ed.), Socializing Epistemology: The Social Dimensions of Knowledge. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 93--110.
Socializing Epistemology: The Social Dimensions of Knowledge.Frederick F. Schmitt (ed.) - 1994 - Rowman & Littlefield.
Good arguments.Richard Feldman - 1994 - In Frederick F. Schmitt (ed.), Socializing Epistemology: The Social Dimensions of Knowledge. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 159--188.
Schmitt's Socializing Epistemology: The Social Dimensions of Knowledge.Patrick J. J. Phillips - 1999 - Informal Logic 19 (2).
Schmitt's Socializing Epistemology: The Social Dimensions of Knowledge. [REVIEW]J. Phillips - 1999 - Informal Logic 19 (2).
Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Helen E. Longino.Jerome Ravetz - 1991 - Isis 82 (3):602-603.
Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Helen E. Longino. [REVIEW]Steve Fuller - 1993 - Philosophy of Science 60 (2):360-362.
Helen E. Longino, The Fate of Knowledge. [REVIEW]K. B. Wray - 2002 - Philosophy in Review 22 (5):334-335.
Helen E. Longino, The Fate of Knowledge Reviewed by.K. Brad Wray - 2002 - Philosophy in Review 22 (5):334-335.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-31
Downloads
7 (#1,634,809)
6 months
7 (#698,214)
2014-01-31
Downloads
7 (#1,634,809)
6 months
7 (#698,214)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Public Trust in Science: Exploring the Idiosyncrasy-Free Ideal.Marion Boulicault & S. Andrew Schroeder - 2021 - In Kevin Vallier & Michael Weber (eds.), Social Trust: Foundational and Philosophical Issues. Routledge.
Identifying Pseudoscience: A Social Process Criterion.Gregory W. Dawes - 2018 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 49 (3):283-298.
What Knowers Know Well: Women, Work, and the Academy.Alison Wylie - 2011 - In Heidi Grasswick (ed.), Feminist Epistemology and Philosophy of Science: Power in Knowledge. Springer. pp. 157-179.
The epistemic significance of consensus.Aviezer Tucker - 2003 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 46 (4):501 – 521.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-f8568656d-zm6qt uwo