Data, Please

Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 3 (1):144-146 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A call for serious study of the status of women in the philosophy of science subfield, study that goes beyond simple demographic data to more sophisticated bibliometric data that looks at inclusion in textbooks, citation patterns, the history of topic and idea attribution, etc.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,247

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Women in the History of Philosophy of Science: What We Do and Do Not Know.Hanne Andersen - 2013 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 3 (1):136-139.
Helen Hattab. Descartes on Forms and Mechanisms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. Pp. 236. $93.00. [REVIEW]Maarten Van Dyck - 2011 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 1 (1):157-161.
Yes, There Is a Problem: What Is to Be Done about the Climate for Women in Philosophy?Amy Wuest - 2013 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 3 (1):146-150.
Serendipity and the Unexpected in the History of Philosophy of Science: Reflections on My Editorship of HOPOS (2017-2024). [REVIEW]Lydia Patton - forthcoming - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-15

Downloads
60 (#355,311)

6 months
10 (#404,653)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Helen Longino
Stanford University

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references