Comments on the alleged proof of epiphenomenalism

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 3 (February):355-58 (1952)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

1953

DOI

10.1093/bjps/iii.12.355

Other Versions

original Long, Wilbur (1953) "Comments on the Alleged Proof of Epiphenomenalism". British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 3(12):355-358

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,130

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Comments on: Mark Woodhouse, A New Epiphenomenalism?.Keith Campbell - 1974 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 52 (2):170-173.
Epiphenomenalism as a solution to the ontological mind-body problem.Dieter Birnbacher - 1988 - Ratio 1 (1):17-32.
Epiphenomenalism and content.Mark Eli Kalderon - 1987 - Philosophical Studies 52 (1):71-90.
Epiphenomenalism and Machines: A Discussion of Van Rooijen's Critique of Popper.Davor Pećnjak - 1989 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 40 (3):404-408.
Is epiphenomenalism refutable?John O. Wisdom - 1963 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 13 (52):303-306.
Taylor's refutation of epiphenomenalism.Richard Double - 1979 - Journal of Critical Analysis 8 (1):23-28.
Reply to Popper's attack on epiphenomenalism.Gerhard D. Wassermann - 1979 - Mind 88 (October):572-75.
Radical epiphenomenalism: B.f. Skinner's account of private events.Richard E. Creel - 1980 - Behaviorism 8 (1):31-53.
Interactionism revived?Frank Jackson - 1980 - Philosophy of Social Science 10 (September):316-23.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
50 (#436,124)

6 months
13 (#253,952)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references