- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Reading Anselm's Proslogion: The History of Anselm's Argument and its Significance Today
Ashgate. Edited by Anselm (2008)
Abstract
Introduction -- The pre-text : the dialectical origins of Anselm's argument -- The text -- Proslogion -- Pro insipiente -- Responsio -- Commentary on the Proslogion -- Anselm's defence and the Unum argumentum -- The medieval reception -- The modern reception -- Anselm's argument today -- Conclusion: The significance of Anselm's argument.Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Reading Anselm's “Proslogion”: The History of Anselm's Argument and Its Significance Today – By Ian Logan.Lydia Schumacher - 2010 - Modern Theology 26 (3):471-473.
Reading Anselm's Proslogion: The History of Anselm's Argument and its Significance Today. By Ian Logan.Toivo J. Holopainen - 2011 - Heythrop Journal 52 (1):129-130.
Ian Logan, Reading Anselm's “Proslogion”: The History of Anselm's Argument and Its Significance Today.(Ashgate New Critical Thinking in Religion, Theology and Biblical Studies.) Farnham, Eng., and Burlington, Vt.: Ashgate, 2009. Pp. ix, 220. $99.95. [REVIEW]Sandra L. Visser - 2010 - Speculum 85 (3):705-706.
St. Anselm's Proslogion: With a Reply on Behalf of the Fool by Gaunilo and the Author's Reply to Gaunilo.Saint Anselm - 1979 - Notre Dame [Ind.]: University of Notre Dame Press. Edited by M. J. Charlesworth, Gaunilo & Anselm.
Why Anselm's Proof in the Proslogion is not an Ontological Argument.G. E. M. Anscombe - 1985 - Thoreau Quarterly 17 (1-2):32-40.
The Proslogion Argument of Anselm as a Non-Reductionist Example of Philosophical Theology.Forrest Edward Baird - 1980 - Dissertation, The Claremont Graduate University
From belief to understanding: a study of Anselm's Proslogion argument on the existence of God.Richard Campbell - 1976 - Canberra: Faculty of Arts, Australian National University.
The Ontological Argument: A Critique of St. Anselm's Proslogion Ii and Iii.Earl Raye Winkler - 1971 - Dissertation, University of Colorado at Boulder
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
106 (#198,456)
6 months
2 (#1,685,363)
2009-01-28
Downloads
106 (#198,456)
6 months
2 (#1,685,363)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Did Anselm Define God? Against the Definitionist Misrepresentation of Anselm’s Famous Description of God.Christian Tapp & Geo Siegwart - 2022 - Philosophia 50 (4):2125-2160.
Formal reconstructions of St. Anselm’s ontological argument.Esther Ramharter & Günther Eder - 2015 - Synthese 192 (9):2795-2825.
Anselm’s Faith as Orientation, Criterion and Promotion of Philosophical Inquiry.Roberto Di Ceglie - forthcoming - In Ian Logan (ed.), "Anselm of Canterbury: Nature, Order and the Divine" (Leiden: Brill, 2024), pp. 111-134.
Wittgenstein’s Case for the Fool: Existence in the Mind Is a Mentalist Assumption in Anselm’s Epistemological Argument in Proslogion, 2.Andrey Pukhaev - forthcoming - Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy.
Aristotle, Arabic.Marc Geoffroy - 2011 - In H. Lagerlund (ed.), Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Springer. pp. 105--116.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6b8b7fc7ff-tfxs4 uwo