Science and Pseudoscience: Criteria of Demarcation

Reason Papers 8:49-58 (1982)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,225

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Pseudoscience and the Demarcation Problem.Massimo Pigliucci - 2023 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Criterios de demarcación, pseudociencia y cientificidad en el derecho.Christian Escobar-Jiménez - 2018 - Cinta de Moebio 61:123-139.
Cutting the Gordian Knot of Demarcation.Sven Ove Hansson - 2009 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 23 (3):237-243.
An Analysis of the Demarcation Problem in Philosophy of Science and Its Application to Homeopathy.Alper Bilgehan Yardımcı - 2018 - Flsf 1 (25):91-107.
What do we mean when we speak of pseudoscience? The development of a demarcation criterion based on the analysis of twenty-one previous attempts.Angelo Fasce - 2017 - Disputatio 6 (7).
The fuzziness of pseudoscience: Massimo Pigliucci and Maarten Boudry : Philosophy of pseudoscience: Reconsidering the demarcation problem. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013, vii+469, $105 HB, $35 PB.Robert Nola - 2014 - Metascience 24 (2):279-284.
Science and Pseudoscience The Difference in Practice and the Difference/t Makes.Michael Shermer - 2013 - In Massimo Pigliucci & Maarten Boudry (eds.), Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem. University of Chicago Press. pp. 203.
Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem.Massimo Pigliucci & Maarten Boudry (eds.) - 2013 - University of Chicago Press.
Science and Pseudoscience How to Demarcate after the (Alleged) Demise.Martin Mahner - 2013 - In Massimo Pigliucci & Maarten Boudry (eds.), Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem. University of Chicago Press. pp. 29.
Popular Science to Professional Science.Michael Ruse - 2013 - In Massimo Pigliucci & Maarten Boudry (eds.), Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem. University of Chicago Press. pp. 225.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-22

Downloads
1 (#1,944,319)

6 months
1 (#1,886,846)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Astrology Pseudoscience and a Discussion About Its Threats to Society.Tevfik Uyar - 2016 - Journal of Higher Education and Science 6:1.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references