Leibniz’s Scientific Collaboration with Adam Kochański, S.J

Roczniki Filozoficzne 65 (2):205-222 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The exchange of thoughts between Adam Kochański and Leibniz presented in this paper points to a very large spectrum of scientific interests shared by both scientists. The scope of their research included, above all, mathematics, philosophy, linguistics, the construction of a calculating device, a perpetuum mobile, other mechanics, and alchemy. Both men became close to each other through their passion for mathematics in which they searched for a universal method of scientific investigation, a method that would be of use not only in solving typically mathematical puzzles, but would also serve to solve problems in physics and other technical sciences. The ideas they exchanged, in particular those concerning the calculating machine, a perpetuum mobile and the universal cure, the panaceum, indicate a very special aspect of their scientific activity, namely their openness to the technical problems discussed in their time. Both Kochański and Leibniz regarded seriously the practical dimension of human life as it manifested itself in the technical problems that occupied the minds of their contemporaries. They both treated the scientific treatment of these problems as an important area of scientific and technical activity. Kochański, like Leibniz, firmly believed that science should be concerned with practical activity, the attitude captured by one of the principles of his philosophy, Theoria cum praxi. This principle, shared by both learned men, forms one of their principal philosophical ideas.Adam Kochański and Leibniz were scientists and philosophers living in a time of revolutionary changes in both European philosophy and science; they keenly appreciated the value of new currents in intellectual life, yet they did not lose sight of philosophical tradition, especially the tradition of Aristotelian philosophy, which they both regarded as an important vehicle of truth. Thus, in their style of doing philosophy and science, one finds certain peripatetic traits, for example the acceptance of the Aristotelian conception of philosophy as science.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,458

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Alchemia Adama Kochańskiego SJ.Bogdan Lisiak - 1970 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 9 (1):217-232.
Nauka w oczach erudytów.Paweł Jan Polak - 2019 - Philosophical Problems in Science 66:305-309.
G.W. Leibniz: Sign and the Problem of Expression.Dimitri A. Bayuk & Olga B. Fedorova - 2020 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 57 (1):146-165.
The notion of philosophy in the correspondence between Adam Kochański, S.J. and Gottfried Leibniz.Bogdan Lisiak - 2003 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 8:247-248.
Linguistic aspects of science.Leonard Bloomfield - 1935 - Philosophy of Science 2 (4):499-517.
In memoriam: Dr. William M. Malisoff.Philip Frank & C. West Churchman - 1948 - Philosophy of Science 15 (1):1-3.
Philosophy and Technology.Liana Pop - 1998 - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 39:29-34.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-08-24

Downloads
12 (#1,372,094)

6 months
8 (#591,777)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references