Constructing affiliation and solidarity in job interviews

Discourse and Communication 2 (4):411-432 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Success in job interviews depends largely on the interviewers' favourable opinion of the candidates' presentation, and how well candidates have managed to build solidarity with their interviewers. This article explores the ways in which candidates shape their talk to interact interpersonally with their interviewers, so as to construct affiliation and solidarity. Drawing on Systemic Functional Linguistics Appraisal theory, in particular its system of Attitude, this article examines a set of authentic job interviews in French, or French and English. The interview analyses are complemented by the candidates' comments on the impressions they had tried to convey and the interviewers' comments about their impressions of the candidates. The analysis identifies two strategies whereby candidates may construct affiliation and solidarity with their interviewers: expressing their enthusiasm for and interest in their work and profession, and demonstrating their professional ability. It also highlights the damaging effect of expressing negative feelings and opinions.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Personalised revision of `failed' questions.Charles Antaki - 2002 - Discourse Studies 4 (4):411-428.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-25

Downloads
8 (#1,582,940)

6 months
6 (#869,904)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The assessment of individual moral goodness.Raymond B. Chiu & Rick D. Hackett - 2016 - Business Ethics: A European Review 26 (1):31-46.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references