The Substitutional Paradox in Russell's 1907 Letter to Hawtrey [see corrected reprint in next issue]

Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 22 (1):47-55 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This note presents a transcription of Russell's letter to Hawtrey of 22 January 1907 accompanied by some proposed emendations. In that letter Russell describes the paradox that he says "pilled" the "substitutional theory" developed just before he turned to the theory of types. A close paraphrase of the derivation of the paradox in a contemporary Lemmon-style natural deduction system shows which axioms the theory must assume to govern its characteristic notion of substituting individuals and propositions for each other in other propositions. Other discussions of this paradox in the literature are mentioned. I conclude with remarks about the significance of the paradox for Russell.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,394

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Substitutional Paradox in Russell's 1907 Letter to Hawtrey [corrected reprint].Bernard Linsky - 2002 - Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 22 (2).
Russell´s Early Type Theory and the Paradox of Propositions.André Fuhrmann - 2001 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 5 (1-2):19–42.
Russell's way out of the paradox of propositions.André Fuhrmann - 2002 - History and Philosophy of Logic 23 (3):197-213.
Russell on Denoting.Paolo Mario Dau - 1980 - Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh
The 1900 Turn in Bertrand Russell’s Logic, the Emergence of his Paradox, and the Way Out.Nikolay Milkov - 2016 - Siegener Beiträge Zur Geschichte Und Philosophie der Mathematik 7:29-50.
On Russell's vulnerability to Russell's paradox.James Levine - 2001 - History and Philosophy of Logic 22 (4):207-231.
Intuition and Russell´s Paradox.Margaret Cuonzo - 2001 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 5 (1-2):73–86.
Paradoxical propositions.Graham Priest - 2018 - Philosophical Issues 28 (1):300-307.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-07

Downloads
38 (#593,784)

6 months
16 (#189,039)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bernard Linsky
University of Alberta

Citations of this work

The functions of Russell’s no class theory.Kevin C. Klement - 2010 - Review of Symbolic Logic 3 (4):633-664.
Review of Terence Parsons, Articulating Medieval Logic. [REVIEW]Paul Thom - 2015 - History and Philosophy of Logic 36 (2):178-181.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references