Some notes on Carnap's concept of intensional isomorphism and the paradox of analysis

Philosophy of Science 16 (4):343-347 (1949)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,130

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A reply to Leonard Linsky.Rudolf Carnap - 1949 - Philosophy of Science 16 (4):347-350.
Constructions.Pavel Tichy - 1986 - Philosophy of Science 53 (4):514-534.
Leonard Linsky, Oblique Contexts. [REVIEW]Thomas Patton - 1985 - Philosophy in Review 5:264-267.
Reference and modality, de Leonard Linsky.Francisco Vera - 1971 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 1 (4):131-133.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
128 (#170,837)

6 months
14 (#225,286)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Belief and propositions.Arthur Pap - 1957 - Philosophy of Science 24 (2):123-136.
Comments on the paradox of analysis.Lennart Äqvist - 1962 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 5 (1-4):260-264.
The limits of logical empiricism: selected papers of Arthur Pap.Arthur Pap - 2006 - Dordrecht: Springer. Edited by Alfons Keupink & Sanford Shieh.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references