Abstract
School administrators are mandated to take the
instructional leadership roles. On this premise, a study assessed the
extent of instructional leadership practices of public elementary
school administrators in El Salvador City Division, Philippines. Also,
it explored their actual practices, challenges encountered, and the
ways they overcome the challenges in practicing instructional
leadership. It employed a mixed-method research design. It
administered the adopted assessment tool on instructional
leadership to 15 school administrators and 12 of them were
involved in the individual interviews. This was conducted between
the last quarter of 2019 and the first quarter of 2020. Descriptive
statistics were used to describe the extent of instructional
leadership practices. Also, it analyzed the actual practices, the
challenges encountered, and the ways of overcoming these
challenges using thematic narrative analysis. Results revealed that
public school administrators have always practiced the four
domains or strands of instructional leadership to a very high extent.
Providing the technical assistance, conducting clinical supervision,
and innovating teaching and learning emerged as themes of their
actual practices. These administrators had encountered challenges
in dealing with teachers’ attitudes, conflicting schedules and
activities, and teachers’ resistance to changes. They overcome the
challenges by trying to meet the competency standards, adapting
and modifying the existing programs, contextualizing teaching and
learning, and inculcating the value and benefits of class observation.
Looking at the findings from the lens of deliberate practice theory, it
was concluded that school administrators have indicated they have
acquired knowledge and a high level of understanding of their
instructional leadership roles. But despite of this, they still met
challenges and have tried their best to manage them. This study
presented some doable and practical recommendations to the
Department of Education (DepEd) and concerned offices which may
benefit both the internal and external stakeholders of the schools.