Countable structures, Ehrenfeucht strategies, and wadge reductions

Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (4):1325-1348 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

For countable structures U and B, let $\mathfrak{U}\overset{\alpha}{\rightarrow}\mathfrak{B}$ abbreviate the statement that every Σ0 α (Lω1,ω) sentence true in U also holds in B. One can define a back and forth game between the structures U and B that determines whether $\mathfrak{U}\overset{\alpha}{\rightarrow}\mathfrak{B}$ . We verify that if θ is an Lω,ω sentence that is not equivalent to any Lω,ω Σ0 n sentence, then there are countably infinite models U and B such that $\mathfrak{U} \vDash \theta, \mathfrak{B} \vDash \neg \theta$ , and $\mathfrak{U}\overset{n}{\rightarrow}\mathfrak{B}$ . For countable languages L there is a natural way to view L structures with universe ω as a topological space, XL. Let [U] = {B ∈ XL∣B ≅ U} denote the isomorphism class of U. Let U and B be countably infinite nonisomorphic L structures, and let $C \subseteq \omega^\omega$ be any Π0 α subset. Our main result states that if $\mathfrak{U}\overset{\alpha}{\rightarrow}\mathfrak{B}$ , then there is a continuous function f: ωω → XL with the property that $x \in C \Rightarrow f(x) \in \lbrack\mathfrak{U}\rbrack$ and $x \notin C \Rightarrow f(x) \in \lbrack\mathfrak{B}\rbrack$ . In fact, for α ≤ 3, the continuous function f can be defined from the $\overset{\alpha}{\rightarrow}$ relation

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On Scott and Karp trees of uncountable models.Tapani Hyttinen & Jouko Väänänen - 1990 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 55 (3):897-908.
Limit ultrapowers and abstract logics.Paolo Lipparini - 1987 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 52 (2):437-454.
Groupwise density and related cardinals.Andreas Blass - 1990 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 30 (1):1-11.
A Spector-Gandy theorem for cPC d () classes.Shaughan Lavine - 1992 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (2):478-500.
The amalgamation spectrum.John T. Baldwin, Alexei Kolesnikov & Saharon Shelah - 2009 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 74 (3):914-928.
Weak partition properties on trees.Michael Hrušák, Petr Simon & Ondřej Zindulka - 2013 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 52 (5-6):543-567.
Around splitting and reaping for partitions of ω.Hiroaki Minami - 2010 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 49 (4):501-518.
The rudin–keisler ordering of p-points under ???? = ????Andrzej Starosolski - 2021 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 86 (4):1691-1705.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
38 (#595,594)

6 months
9 (#495,347)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Descriptive Set Theory.Yiannis Nicholas Moschovakis - 1982 - Studia Logica 41 (4):429-430.

Add more references