Bad company tamed

Synthese 170 (3):371 - 391 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The neo-Fregean project of basing mathematics on abstraction principles faces “the bad company problem,” namely that a great variety of unacceptable abstraction principles are mixed in among the acceptable ones. In this paper I propose a new solution to the problem, based on the idea that individuation must take the form of a well-founded process. A surprising aspect of this solution is that every form of abstraction on concepts is permissible and that paradox is instead avoided by restricting what concepts there are.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 107,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Introduction.Øystein Linnebo - 2009 - Synthese 170 (3):321-329.
Bad company generalized.Gabriel Uzquiano - 2009 - Synthese 170 (3):331 - 347.
Conservativeness, Stability, and Abstraction.Roy T. Cook - 2012 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63 (3):673-696.
Bad company and neo-Fregean philosophy.Matti Eklund - 2009 - Synthese 170 (3):393-414.
Which abstraction principles are acceptable? Some limitative results.Øystein Linnebo & Gabriel Uzquiano - 2009 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (2):239-252.
Abstraction Reconceived.J. P. Studd - 2016 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 67 (2):579-615.
Structural-Abstraction Principles.Graham Leach-Krouse - 2015 - Philosophia Mathematica:nkv033.
Cardinality and Acceptable Abstraction.Roy T. Cook & Øystein Linnebo - 2018 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 59 (1):61-74.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
302 (#99,574)

6 months
20 (#160,121)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Øystein Linnebo
University of Oslo

Citations of this work

The potential hierarchy of sets.Øystein Linnebo - 2013 - Review of Symbolic Logic 6 (2):205-228.
Cardinality and Acceptable Abstraction.Roy T. Cook & Øystein Linnebo - 2018 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 59 (1):61-74.
Abstraction Reconceived.J. P. Studd - 2016 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 67 (2):579-615.
Collective Abstraction.Jon Erling Litland - 2022 - Philosophical Review 131 (4):453-497.
Structuralist Neologicism†.Francesca Boccuni & Jack Woods - 2020 - Philosophia Mathematica 28 (3):296-316.

View all 26 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Logic, Logic, and Logic.George Boolos - 1998 - Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. Edited by Richard C. Jeffrey.
The limits of abstraction.Kit Fine - 2002 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Matthias Schirn.
Logic, Logic and Logic.George Boolos & Richard C. Jeffrey - 1998 - Studia Logica 66 (3):428-432.
Fixing Frege.John P. Burgess - 2005 - Princeton University Press.

View all 25 references / Add more references