A Dilemma for Modest Actual Intentionalism

British Journal of Aesthetics 60 (2):165-181 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Modest actual intentionalism is a major position on interpretation in contemporary analytic aesthetics. The position consists of a disjunctive formulation according to which work-meaning is determined by the author’s intention when such intention succeeds or by non-intentionalistic factors when it fails. I challenge the disjunctive view by presenting a constructive dilemma, the conclusion being that modest actual intentionalism ends up either making non-intentionalistic factors idle or making authorial intent superfluous.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,173

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-02-18

Downloads
83 (#252,014)

6 months
13 (#256,009)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Szu-Yen Lin
Soochow University (Taiwan)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Art, intention, and conversation.Noël Carroll - 1992 - In Gary Iseminger (ed.), Intention and interpretation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. pp. 97--131.
Authors, Intentions and Literary Meaning.Sherri Irvin - 2006 - Philosophy Compass 1 (2):114–128.
Moderate actual intentionalism defended.Robert Stecker - 2006 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 64 (4):429-438.
An epistemic dilemma for actual intentionalism.Saam Trivedi - 2001 - British Journal of Aesthetics 41 (2):192-206.
The intentional fallacy: Defending Beardsley.George Dickie & W. Kent Wilson - 1995 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 53 (3):233-250.

View all 7 references / Add more references