Morality, Simulacrum and Distraction: The Function of Art according to Rousseau

Artefilosofia 15:73-82 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Jean-Jacques Rousseau was undoubtedly the first to investigate the ethical role of art in modern philosophical thought. However, his position was decidedly eccentric amidst the backdrop of the Enlightenment. According to Rousseau, Art was responsible for the destruction of virtue, but is responsible now for concocting a moral veneer. Art’s function is to construct this “moral veneer” that brings a stop to man’s turpitudes or, at least, reduces their occurrence. Art’s ethical benefit is not that it leads man to do good. Rather, the artistic simulacrum prevents the most hideous crimes from occurring. This paper investigates the ethical role of art in Rousseau's First Discourse and in the preface to his play Narcissus or the Self-Admirer.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-03-20

Downloads
1,683 (#8,866)

6 months
275 (#8,544)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

João Gabriel Lima Da Silva
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references