Relationality without obligation

Analysis 82 (2):238-246 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Some reasons are thought to depend on relations between people, such as that of a promiser to a promisee. It has sometimes been assumed that all reasons that are relational in this way are moral obligations. I argue, via a counter example, that there are non-obligatory relational reasons. If true, this has ramifications for relational theories of morality.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Relational Contractualism and Future Persons.Michael Gibb - 2016 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 13 (2):135-160.
Responsibility and Normative Moral Theories.Jada Twedt Strabbing - 2018 - Philosophical Quarterly 68 (272):603-625.
Promising by Normative Assurance.Luca Passi - 2023 - Philosophical Quarterly 73 (4):1004-1023.
The Standard-Relational Theory of 'Ought' and the Oughtistic Theory of Reasons.Daan Evers - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (1):131-147.
Do We Have Relational Reasons to Care About Intergenerational Equality?Caleb Althorpe & Elizabeth Finneron-Burns - 2025 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy (3):421-442.
Relational Moral Demands.Fabienne Peter - forthcoming - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society.
Rejecting moral obligation.Simon Robertson - 2005 - Dissertation, St. Andrews

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-11-03

Downloads
762 (#36,555)

6 months
170 (#27,395)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James H. P. Lewis
Cardiff University

References found in this work

The Moral Nexus.R. Jay Wallace - 2019 - Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Relational Primitivism.Ariel Zylberman - 2019 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 102 (2):401-422.

View all 6 references / Add more references