Czy dopuszczamy karę w zastępstwie za winowajcę? (przeł. Joanna Klara Teske)

Roczniki Filozoficzne 69 (4):497-505 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The David Lewis’s article concerns the issue of penal substitution in the dual context of the contemporary system of criminal law, in which punishment does not perform a compensatory function, and in the context of the Christian interpretation of Christ’s death as Atonement. It may seem that we do not believe in penal substitution, but in fact we do believe in it selectively. There are Christians who believe that Christ’s death is a payment of the debt of punishment owed by the sinners, but do not believe that a murderer’s friend can serve on his behalf a death sentence. Most of us believe in penal substitution with reference to fines but not other kinds of punishment. In both cases the beliefs concerning penal substitution are clearly inconsistent. However, if selective acceptance of penal substitution is so common, perhaps it makes sense after all.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,486

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Do we believe in penal substitution?David K. Lewis - 1997 - Philosophical Papers 26 (3):203 - 209.
Punishing and Atoning: A New Critique of Penal Substitution.Brent G. Kyle - 2013 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 74 (2):201-218.
Do We Believe in Consequences? Revisiting the “Incoherence Objection” to Penal Substitution.Christopher Woznicki - 2018 - Neue Zeitschrift für Systematicsche Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie 60 (2):208-228.
Atonement and the Concept of Punishment.Daniel J. Hill & Joseph Jedwab - 2015 - In Oliver Crisp & Fred Sanders, Locating Atonement. Zondervan Academic. pp. 139-153.
Not Penal Substitution but Vicarious Punishment.Mark C. Murphy - 2009 - Faith and Philosophy 26 (3):253-273.
Original sin and atonement.Oliver D. Crisp - 2008 - In Thomas P. Flint & Michael Rea, The Oxford handbook of philosophical theology. New York: Oxford University Press.
The coherence of equivocal penal substitution: modern and scholastic voices.G. H. Labooy & P. M. Wisse - 2019 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 86 (3):227-241.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-12-07

Downloads
37 (#640,129)

6 months
7 (#469,699)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David K. Lewis
PhD: Harvard University; Last affiliation: Princeton University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

[no title].Eleonore Stump (ed.) - 1993 - Cornell Univ Pr.
On Punishment.A. M. Quinton - 1953 - Analysis 14 (6):133 - 142.
The Christian Scheme of Salvation.Richard Swinburne - 1988 - In Thomas V. Morris, Philosophy and the Christian Faith. Univ. Of Notre Dame Press. pp. 13-30.

View all 6 references / Add more references