Broad Infinity and Generation Principles

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic -1:1-63 (2025)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We introduce Broad Infinity, a new set-theoretic axiom scheme based on the slogan “Every time we construct a new element, we gain a new arity.” It says that three-dimensional trees whose growth is controlled by a specified class function form a set. Such trees are called broad numbers. Assuming AC (the axiom of choice) or at least the weak version known as WISC (weakly initial set of covers), we show that Broad Infinity is equivalent to Mahlo’s principle, which says that the class of all regular limit ordinals is stationary. Assuming AC or WISC, Broad Infinity also yields a convenient principle for generating a subset of a class using a “rubric” (family of rules); this directly gives the existence of Grothendieck universes, without requiring a detour via ordinals. In the absence of choice, Broad Infinity implies that the derivations of elements from a rubric form a set; this yields the existence of Tarski-style universes. Additionally, we reveal a pattern of resemblance between “wide” principles, that are provable in ZFC, and “broad” principles, that go beyond ZFC. Note: this paper uses a base theory that is weaker than ZF but includes classical first-order logic and Replacement.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,880

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-02-12

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Levy
University of Birmingham

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Happy families.A. R. D. Mathias - 1977 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 12 (1):59.
The strength of Mac Lane set theory.A. R. D. Mathias - 2001 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 110 (1-3):107-234.
What is the theory without power set?Victoria Gitman, Joel David Hamkins & Thomas A. Johnstone - 2016 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 62 (4-5):391-406.
On Interpretations of Arithmetic and Set Theory.Richard Kaye & Tin Lok Wong - 2007 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 48 (4):497-510.
A simple maximality principle.Joel Hamkins - 2003 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 68 (2):527-550.

View all 16 references / Add more references