A Reply to Anja Jauernig’s article, ‘Leibniz on Motion and the Equivalence of Hypothesis,’ The Leibniz Review, Vol. 18, 2008

The Leibniz Review 20:139-150 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

15241556

DOI

10.5840/leibniz20102010

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,733

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Leibniz on Motion – Reply to Edward Slowik.Anja Jauernig - 2009 - The Leibniz Review 19:139-147.
Another Go-Around on Leibniz and Rotation.Edward Slowik - 2009 - The Leibniz Review 19:131-137.
Reply to Donald Rutherford.Julia Jorati - 2017 - The Leibniz Review 27:199-208.
Leibniz on Motion and the Equivalence of Hypotheses.Anja Jauernig - 2008 - The Leibniz Review 18:1-40.
Reply to Ohad Nachtomy.Anne-Lise Rey - 2012 - The Leibniz Review 22:175-177.
Reply to Michael Seidler.Roger Berkowitz - 2006 - The Leibniz Review 16:101-103.
Reply to Philip Beeley.Glenn A. Hartz - 2006 - The Leibniz Review 16:199-201.
Reply to Ohad Nachtomy.Richard T. W. Arthur - 2014 - The Leibniz Review 24:131-133.
Reply to Sarah Tietz. [REVIEW]Sarah Tietz - 2013 - The Leibniz Review 23:129-131.
Reply to Brandon Look.Andreas Blank - 2006 - The Leibniz Review 16:123-124.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-18

Downloads
92 (#226,879)

6 months
17 (#167,779)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references