Time and the anthropic principle

Mind 101 (403):521-540 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Carter’s anthropic principle reminds us that intelligent life can find itself only in life-permitting times, places or universes. The principle concerns a possible observational selection effect, not a designing deity. It has no special concern with humans, nor does it say that intelligent life is inevitable and common. Barrow and Tipler, who discuss all this, are not biologically ignorant. As argued in "Universes" (Leslie, 1989) they may well be right in thinking that "fine tuning" of force strengths and particle masses, without which life would be impossible, proves the reality of God or else of multiple universes plus observational selection

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,951

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Fine Tuning and Divine Design.John Leslie - 2002 - Maritain Studies/Etudes Maritainiennes 18:3 - 13.
There is no adequate definition of ?Fine-tuned for life?Neil A. Manson - 2000 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 43 (3):341 – 351.
A Theological Critique of the Fine-Tuning Argument.Hans Halvorson - 2018 - In Matthew A. Benton, John Hawthorne & Dani Rabinowitz, Knowledge, Belief, and God: New Insights in Religious Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 122-135.
Barrow and Tipler on the anthropic principle vs. divine design.William Lane Craig - 1988 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39 (3):389-395.
Life, Intelligence, and the Selection of Universes.Rüdiger Vaas - 2019 - In Yordanov Georgi Georgiev, John M. Smart & Claudio L. Flores Martinez, Evolution, Development and Complexity. Springer. pp. 93-133.
Existence, Causation, and Life.John Leslie - 2007 - In Immortality Defended. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 71–86.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
314 (#96,229)

6 months
8 (#540,103)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Observer‐relative chances and the doomsday argument.John Leslie - 1997 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 40 (4):427 – 436.
Comment l'Urne de Carter et Leslie se Déverse dans celle de Hempel.Paul Franceschi - 1999 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 29 (1):139-156.
A Third Route to the Doomsday Argument.Paul Franceschi - 2002 - Journal of Philosophical Research 34:263-278.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references