A Neoplatonist’s Pantheism

The Monist 80 (2):218-231 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I call myself a neoplatonist. I think that The Good is responsible for the world’s existence or, more technically, that the world owes its existence to its creative ethical requiredness. How could this curious theory be defended, and what excuses could there be for calling it pantheistic?

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

00269662

DOI

10.5840/monist19978026

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,505

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

I.Wilfrid Sellars - 1981 - The Monist 64 (1):3-36.
On Proofs for the Existence of God.James F. Ross - 1970 - The Monist 54 (2):201-217.
Pantheism and Science.Peter Forrest - 1997 - The Monist 80 (2):307-319.
Pantheism.T. L. S. Sprigge - 1997 - The Monist 80 (2):191-217.
Melville’s Billy and the Secular Problem of Evil.Peter Kivy - 1980 - The Monist 63 (4):480-493.
Existence.Dorothy Wrinch - 1919 - The Monist 29 (1):141-145.
The organism view defended.S. Matthew Liao - 2006 - The Monist 89 (3):334-350.
Existence, Predication, and Anselm.Patricia Crawford - 1966 - The Monist 50 (1):109-124.
Studies In The Logic of Existence and Necessity.Jaakko Hintikka - 1966 - The Monist 50 (1):55-76.
On the Process of Coming into Existence.Antony Galton - 2006 - The Monist 89 (3):294-312.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
130 (#169,476)

6 months
14 (#233,812)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references