What Is the Goal of Proof? A Reaction to "What Do Mathematicians Want?" by Don Fallis

Logique Et Analyse 45 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,448

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Reply to "What Is the Goal of Proof?" by Aaron Lercher.Don Fallis - 2002 - Logique Et Analyse 45.
What Do Mathematicians Want? Probabilistic Proofs and the Epistemic Goals of Mathematicians.Don Fallis - 2002 - Logique Et Analyse 45.
Probabilistic Proofs and the Collective Epistemic Goals of Mathematicians.Don Fallis - 2011 - In Collective Epistemology. pp. 157-175.
What numbers are.Richard Routley - 1965 - Logique Et Analyse 8:196-208.
What is a Proposition?Jan Berg - 1967 - Logique Et Analyse 10:293-306.
What is a singular term?W. S. Croddy - 1982 - Logique Et Analyse 25 (98):191.
Proof, Cognition, and Rationality.Ron Rood - 2002 - Logique Et Analyse 45.
Lakatos on proof and on mathematics.J. Agassi - 1981 - Logique Et Analyse 24 (95):437.
What is a non-normal world?Graham Priest - 1992 - Logique Et Analyse 35:291-302.
What is Law? - Beyond Scholasticism.B. Le Baron - 1971 - Logique Et Analyse 14 (53):77.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-06

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Aaron Lercher
Louisiana State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references