Synchronisation rules and transitivity

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 27 (4):399-402 (1976)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,854

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Review. A novel defense of scientific realism. Jarrett Leplin.Jac Ladyman - 1999 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50 (1):181-188.
Leplin on essentialism.Dudley Shapere - 1991 - Philosophy of Science 58 (4):655-677.
Laudan and Leplin on empirical equivalence.Samir Okasha - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (2):251-256.
Jarrett Leplin, A Novel Defense of Scientific Realism.P. Enfield - 1999 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 7 (2):260-261.
Light signal synchronisation and clock transport synchronisation in the theory of relativity.M. F. Podlaha - 1979 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 30 (4):376-380.
The method to "meaning": A reply to Leplin.Nancy J. Nersessian - 1991 - Philosophy of Science 58 (4):678-686.
Three questions about Leplin’s reliabilism.David Christensen - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 134 (1):43-50.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
39 (#583,660)

6 months
16 (#195,366)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jarrett Leplin
University of North Carolina, Greensboro

Citations of this work

On the interpretation and transitivity of non-standard synchronisms.R. Francis - 1980 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 31 (2):165-173.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The transitivity of non-standard synchronisms.Philip L. Quinn - 1974 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25 (1):78-82.
The intransitivity of non standard synchronisms.I. W. Roxburgh - 1975 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 26 (1):47-49.

Add more references