- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Why am and eurisko appear to work
Artificial Intelligence 23 (3):269-294 (1984)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Eurisko: A program that learns new heuristics and domain concepts.Douglas B. Lenat - 1983 - Artificial Intelligence 21 (1-2):61-98.
A Review of John Seely Brown and Paul Duguid's The Social Life of Information. [REVIEW]Jane Fedorowicz - 2001 - Business and Society Review 106 (1):103-106.
Review of Argumentation methods for artificial intelligence in law by Douglas Walton, Springer-Verlag Berlin and Heidelberg GmbH & Co. K, 2005. [REVIEW]Jelle Reviewer-van Veenen - 2006 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 14 (1):155-157.
In memoriam Douglas N. Walton: the influence of Doug Walton on AI and law.Katie Atkinson, Trevor Bench-Capon, Floris Bex, Thomas F. Gordon, Henry Prakken, Giovanni Sartor & Bart Verheij - 2020 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 28 (3):281-326.
A formal analysis of why heuristic functions work.B. John Oommen & Luis G. Rueda - 2005 - Artificial Intelligence 164 (1-2):1-22.
Douglas Walton, appeal to expert opinion– arguments from authority.Ronald Leenes - 2000 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (2-3):277-281.
Review of Douglas Walton, Witness Testimony Evidence: Argumentation, Artificial Intelligence, and Law. [REVIEW]Michael S. Pardo - 2008 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (11).
Chris and Douglas Walton,'towards a formal account of reasoning about evidence: Argumentation schemes and generalizations'.Bex Floris & Henry Prakken - 2003 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 11:125-165.
Review of quot; Abductive reasoning by Douglas Walton, The University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, 2004. [REVIEW]Danièle Reviewer-Bourcier - 2006 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 14 (3):241-246.
Analytics
Added to PP
2020-12-22
Downloads
23 (#940,365)
6 months
10 (#407,001)
2020-12-22
Downloads
23 (#940,365)
6 months
10 (#407,001)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
SOAR: An architecture for general intelligence.John E. Laird, Allen Newell & Paul S. Rosenbloom - 1987 - Artificial Intelligence 33 (1):1-64.
Classification of Global Catastrophic Risks Connected with Artificial Intelligence.Alexey Turchin & David Denkenberger - 2020 - AI and Society 35 (1):147-163.
The AHA! Experience: Creativity Through Emergent Binding in Neural Networks.Paul Thagard & Terrence C. Stewart - 2011 - Cognitive Science 35 (1):1-33.
What connectionist models learn: Learning and representation in connectionist networks.Stephen José Hanson & David J. Burr - 1990 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (3):471-489.
References found in this work
Eurisko: A program that learns new heuristics and domain concepts.Douglas B. Lenat - 1983 - Artificial Intelligence 21 (1-2):61-98.
Theory formation by heuristic search.Douglas B. Lenat - 1983 - Artificial Intelligence 21 (1-2):31-59.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-559df78dcc-ppxv8 uwo