Larger reward values alone are not enough to entice more cooperation

Thinking and Reasoning 17 (1):82-103 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,130

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Epistemic Responsibilism and Moorean Dogmatism.Martin Grajner - 2015 - Logos and Episteme 6 (3):291-307.
Enough is Enough: Austin on Knowing.Guy Longworth - 2017 - In Savas L. Tsohatzidis (ed.), Interpreting J. L. Austin: Critical Essays. Cambridge University Press. pp. 186–205.
Counterfactual Thinking in Cooperation Dynamics.Francisco Santos & Luís Pereira - 2019 - In Matthieu Fontaine, Cristina Barés-Gómez, Francisco Salguero-Lamillar, Lorenzo Magnani & Ángel Nepomuceno-Fernández (eds.), Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Technology: Inferential Models for Logic, Language, Cognition and Computation. Springer Verlag.
Double effect reasoning and cooperation.Ray Campbell - 2012 - Bioethics Research Notes 24 (1):1.
Reward is enough.David Silver, Satinder Singh, Doina Precup & Richard S. Sutton - 2021 - Artificial Intelligence 299 (C):103535.
Critical reasoning.Robin Roth - 2010 - San Diego: Cognella. Edited by Doug Borcoman.
Reasoning and Its Limits.Kanit Sirichan - 2012 - Philosophia Osaka 7:31-45.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-14

Downloads
50 (#436,124)

6 months
5 (#1,035,700)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references