A new basis for moral philosophy

Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul (1985)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I THE SOURCES OF THE FACT/ VALUE DISTINCTION The Naturalistic Fallacy is considered to be the biggest single obstacle to any attempt to argue for a rational ...

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,337

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A New Basis for Moral Philosophy.Keekok Lee - 1985 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 51 (2):364-365.
Lee, K., A New Basis for Moral Philosophy. [REVIEW]U. Melle - 1989 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 51:364.
A New Basis for Moral Philosophy.Desmond M. Clarke - 1987 - Philosophical Books 28 (1):41-42.
A New Basis for Moral Philosophy. [REVIEW]Peter Simpson - 1987 - Review of Metaphysics 41 (1):152-154.
'The Naturalistic Fallacy, Naturalism and the Fact-Value Distinction'.Debbie Roberts - 2018 - In Neil Sinclair (ed.), The Naturalistic Fallacy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Keekok Lee, "The legal-rational state". [REVIEW]D. M. Adams - 1992 - Journal of Value Inquiry 26 (1):127.
Does Experimental Ethics Have a Normative Account?Toni Gibea - 2016 - Balkan Journal of Philosophy 8 (1):85-92.
Aesthetic Politics. Political Philosophy beyond Fact and Value.[author unknown] - 1998 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 60 (3):625-626.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
39 (#577,026)

6 months
3 (#1,470,638)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Keekok Lee
University of Manchester

Citations of this work

Formulating a plausible relativism.Steve Edwards - 1993 - Philosophia 22 (1-2):63-74.
Years of moral epistemology: A bibliography.Laura Donohue & Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 1991 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 29 (S1):217-229.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references