How to Not Secure Public Trust in Science: Representative Values v. Polarization and Marginalization

Philosophy of Science (Online First):pp. 1 - 16 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The demise of the value-free ideal constitutes a threat to public trust in science. One proposal is that whenever making value judgments, scientists rely only on democratic values. Since the influence of democratic values on scientific claims and recommendations is legitimate, public trust in science is warranted. I challenge this proposal. Appealing to democratic values will not suffice to secure trust because of at least two obstacles: polarization and marginalization.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-01-08

Downloads
302 (#91,883)

6 months
102 (#58,857)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Soazig Le Bihan
University of Montana

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Philosophy of Science After Feminism.Janet A. Kourany - 2010 - , US: Oxford University Press.
In defence of the value free ideal.Gregor Betz - 2013 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 3 (2):207-220.
Democratic Values: A Better Foundation for Public Trust in Science.S. Andrew Schroeder - 2021 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 72 (2):545-562.

View all 12 references / Add more references