Mass nouns, Count nouns and Non-count nouns

In Keith Brown, Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Elsevier (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I present a high-level account of the semantical distinction between count nouns and non-count nouns. The basic idea is that count nouns are semantically either singular or plural and non-count nouns are neither

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,506

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-04-07

Downloads
1,116 (#19,864)

6 months
99 (#69,607)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Henry Laycock
Queen's University

Citations of this work

Purpose-Relativity and Ontology.Nurbay Irmak - 2014 - Dissertation, University of Miami

Add more citations

References found in this work

Theories of masses and problems of constitution.Dean W. Zimmerman - 1995 - Philosophical Review 104 (1):53-110.
A more general theory of definite descriptions.Richard Sharvy - 1980 - Philosophical Review 89 (4):607-624.
Parts and boundaries.Ray Jackendoff - 1992 - In Beth Levin & Steven Pinker, Lexical & conceptual semantics. Cambridge, Ma.: Blackwell. pp. 9-45.
Quantities.Helen Morris Cartwright - 1970 - Philosophical Review 79 (1):25-42.

View all 11 references / Add more references