Deliberation and agential authority: A rejoinder to Ferrero

Philosophical Psychology 16 (4):579 – 584 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

My reply to Ferrero is divided into three parts: a recap of my argument and claim, a response to Ferrero's central criticism, and, finally, a question about his attempted defense of the authorship account.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,757

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reply to Ferrero.Kirk Ludwig - 2015 - Methode: Analytic Perspectives 4 (6):75-87.
Teaching moral theories is an option: reply to Rob Lawlor.D. Benatar - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (6):395-396.
Signor Ferrero or Caesar?T. Rice Holmes - 1910 - Classical Quarterly 4 (04):239-.
Revolution and Legitimacy.Luciano Pellicani - 1985 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 1985 (64):3-14.
Hard incompatibilism and its rivals.Derk Pereboom - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 144 (1):21 - 33.
Rejoinder to Professor Rajendra Prasad's Response.Brian Bruya - 2002 - Journal of the Indian Council of Philosophical Research 19 (2):161-164.
Makin's Ontological Argument (Again).Graham Oppy - 1993 - Philosophy 68 (264):234 - 239.
Reply to Kyburg.Wesley C. Salmon - 1965 - Philosophy of Science 32 (2):152-154.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
78 (#270,552)

6 months
16 (#194,625)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Krista Lawlor
Stanford University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references