What doctors should call their patients

Journal of Medical Ethics 14 (3):129-131 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper discusses the moral difficulties physicians encounter when determining the level of formality they will use when addressing their patients. It is argued that physicians ought not to use a patient's first name unless the patient also uses the physician's first name. In short, physicians and patients should always address each other with the same level of formality. It is argued that this is so even when patients invite physicians to address them informally.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,337

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What doctors should call their patients.R. Payne - 1990 - Journal of Medical Ethics 16 (1):55-55.
Should physicians be allowed to use alcohol while on call?J. F. Peterman - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (1):21-26.
Between Uncertainty and Certainty.Lena Hoff & Göran Hermerén - 2011 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 22 (2):139-150.
Dwelling in the Shadow: Physicians' Decision-Making for Terminally Ill Patients.Stephen Vanhooser Mccrary - 1992 - Dissertation, The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences at Galveston

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
83 (#252,622)

6 months
10 (#410,099)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Lavin
Stanford University (PhD)

Citations of this work

Ethical obligation arising from routine screening.V. Warren - 1990 - Journal of Medical Ethics 16 (1):54-55.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references