Multivalent recognition: The place of Hegel in the Fraser–Honneth debate

Contemporary Political Theory 11 (1):23-40 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,337

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Justice-to-come in the work of Axel Honneth and Nancy Fraser.Miriam Bankovsky - 2012 - In Miriam Bankovsky & Alice Le Goff (eds.), Recognition theory and contemporary French moral and political philosophy: reopening the dialogue. New York: distributed exclusively in the USA by Palgrave Macmillan.
Is redistribution a form of recognition? comments on the Fraser–Honneth debate.Simon Thompson - 2005 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8 (1):85-102.
Recognition: Personal and political.Thomas Baldwin - 2009 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 8 (3):311-328.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-02

Downloads
118 (#182,848)

6 months
17 (#173,529)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Christopher Lauer
University of Hawai'i at Hilo

Citations of this work

Examining the Dialogical Principle in Marek Siemek’s Legacy.Ewa Nowak - 2016 - Dialogue and Universalism 26 (2):157-180.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Political Liberalism.J. Rawls - 1995 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 57 (3):596-598.
Phänomenologie des Geistes.G. W. F. Hegel & J. Hoffmeister - 1807 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 15 (3):528-528.
Phänomenologie des Geistes. Hegel & Georg Lasson - 1908 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 65:218-219.
Recognition without Ethics?Nancy Fraser - 2001 - Theory, Culture and Society 18 (2-3):21-42.

View all 16 references / Add more references