Tuskegee's Truths: Rethinking the Tuskegee Syphilis Study: Edited by S M Reverby. University of North Carolina Press, 2000, pound52.50 (hc), pound19.95 (sc), pp 630. ISBN 0-8078-4852- [Book Review]

Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (3):208-1 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

No one interested in the ethics of biomedical research will have failed to hear about the Tuskegee syphilis study, or, to give it its full title, the US Public Health Service's Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro Male. This study, conducted from 1932 to 1972, on black (African American) males in Tuskegee, Alabama, has, with complete justification, become the paradigm of moral depravity in the field of biomedical research. Virtually every rule of good, ethical research was broken during this “research” over a period of 40 years, down to denying participants even the knowledge, let alone the option, of a remedy when it became available. In recent years, the Tuskegee syphilis study has received renewed public attention, for two reasons. First, in 1996, 24 years after …

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,388

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

“Special Treatment”: BiDil, Tuskegee, and the Logic of Race.Susan M. Reverby - 2008 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (3):478-484.
The Tuskegee Syphilis Study: Some Ethical Reflections.Adebayo A. Ogungbure - 2011 - Thought and Practice: A Journal of the Philosophical Association of Kenya 3 (2):75-92.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
51 (#447,550)

6 months
11 (#246,005)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references