The three rs: A restrictive and refutable rigmarole

Ethics and Behavior 3 (2):177 – 185 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,388

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reassessing the Three Rs?Melanie Challenger - 2020 - Hastings Center Report 50 (3):75-76.
Mr. Farrell and the refutability of psychoanalysis.Michael Martin - 1964 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 7 (1-4):80 – 98.
Fragments from Dinnaga. H. N. Randle.Alban Cooke - 1986 - Buddhist Studies Review 3 (1):81-82.
Institutional Behavior. Floyd H. Allport.John Dollard - 1934 - International Journal of Ethics 44 (4):480-482.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
21 (#1,049,356)

6 months
2 (#1,294,541)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Scientific Autonomy and the 3Rs.Bernard E. Rollin - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (12):62-64.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Animal rights and human morality.Bernard E. Rollin - 1981 - Buffalo, N.Y.: Prometheus Books.
Animal rights & human morality.Bernard E. Rollin (ed.) - 2006 - Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books.
The significance of animal suffering.Peter Singer - 1990 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (1):9-12.

View all 9 references / Add more references