The Take-Ative: Infelicity in Romeo and Juliet

Philosophies 9 (4):125 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There is a curious moment in the balcony scene in Romeo and Juliet. Thinking she speaks in solitude, Juliet says, “Romeo, doff thy name, / And, for thy name, which is no part of thee, / Take all myself”. Emerging from the shadows, Romeo replies, “I take thee at thy word” (Act 2, Scene 1, 92). Suddenly, Juliet’s utterance has seemingly become binding: because they have been overheard by Romeo, her words have become her word. But is Juliet truly bound by her words given that she did not know they were being overheard, let alone intend for them to be binding? Using J. L. Austin’s notion of the performative, I consider the nature and status of Juliet’s utterance, its influence on the remainder of the scene, and what insight it might afford into the play as a whole.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,449

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Exploring the Association between Love and Sex.Guy Pinku - 2010 - In Fritz Allhoff, Michael Bruce & Robert M. Stewart, College Sex ‐ Philosophy for Everyone. Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 158–168.
Romeo and Juliet.William Shakespeare - 1750 - Printed for J. and R. Tonson and S. Draper.
Oskar und Emma statt Romeo und JuliaOskar and Emma in place of Romeo and Juliet.Christine Weder - 2018 - Deutsche Vierteljahrsschrift für Literaturwissenschaft Und Geistesgeschichte 92 (1):43-61.
European Shakespeare On Film: Jovan Živanović, How Romeo And Juliet Loved.Ljiljana Sedlar - 2002 - Facta Universitatis, Series: Linguistics and Literature 9 (2):269-280.
Love Stories: A Reading of Romeo and Juliet.Tzachi Zamir - 1999 - Literature & Aesthetics 9:71-92.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-08-16

Downloads
6 (#1,722,136)

6 months
5 (#702,808)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Intention and convention in speech acts.Peter F. Strawson - 1964 - Philosophical Review 73 (4):439-460.
Philosophy the day after tomorrow.Stanley Cavell - 2005 - Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Freedom of Speech Acts? A Response to Langton.Daniel Jacobson - 1995 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 24 (1):64-78.

View all 6 references / Add more references