The relation of concept and demonstration in the ontological argument..

[Chicago]: University of Chicago Press (1940)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Call number

BT101.L27 1940

DOI

10.2307/2181170

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,130

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Relation of Concept and Demonstration in the Ontological Argument. [REVIEW]E. A. M. & Herbert Lamm - 1941 - Journal of Philosophy 38 (23):642.
The Relation of Concept and Demonstration in the Ontological Argument. [REVIEW]A. M. E. - 1941 - Journal of Philosophy 38 (23):642-643.
Leibniz and the ontological argument.Barry Loewer - 1978 - Philosophical Studies 34 (1):105 - 109.
The importance of cartesian triangles: A new look at Descartes's ontological argument.M. V. Dougherty - 2002 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 10 (1):35 – 62.
Thought Experimenting with God. Revisiting the Ontological Argument.Yiftach J. H. Fehige - 2009 - Neue Zeitschrift für Systematicsche Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie 51 (3):249-267.
Analysis of the Ontological Argument of Gödel.Jesús Baceta - 2017 - Apuntes Filosóficos 26 (50):56-70.
The ontological argument.Jonathan Barnes - 1972 - [New York]: St. Martin's Press.
Commentary on “The Possibility of God”.James Patrick Downey - 1987 - Faith and Philosophy 4 (2):202-206.
A Cosmological Reformulation of Anselm’s Proof That God Exists.Richard Campbell - 2021 - Leiden ; Boston: BRILL.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-05-13

Downloads
13 (#1,318,762)

6 months
2 (#1,686,184)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references