The Moral Complexities of Eating Meat [Book Review]

Between the Species 20 (1) (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Moral Complexities of Eating Meat, Ben Bramble and Bob Fischer eds., Oxford University Press, 2015. (An open-access version of this article is available at the link below.) Vegans who do not eat roadkill are immoral. Consider that the most common rationale for veganism is avoiding unnecessary harm to animals. It is a well-known fact that animals are killed in the cultivation of plant foods such as wheat, corn and soybeans. Mice, rabbits and other field creatures are routinely run over by tractors or cut in two by harvesters. To buy commercial plant food therefore is to sustain the system responsible for these deaths. Road-killed animals, by contrast, are already dead, so the decision to consume them does not perpetuate a lethal process. A diet that consists entirely of plant food therefore will be responsible for a greater number of animal fatalities than a mostly-plant diet that also includes roadkill but no other meat. So goes the argument of Donald Bruckner’s cheeky paper, “Strict Vegetarianism is Immoral,” a standout chapter of The Moral Complexities of Eating Meat. Anyone who follows the animal ethics literature will be familiar with defences of meat eating premised on a rejection of animal rights. Bruckner’s ingenious argument by contrast is premised on animals having rights. This captures something of the collection in general, which offers original moves and thought-provoking conclusions with impressive frequency.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,388

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Moral Complexities of Eating Meat.Mark Bernstein - 2017 - Journal of Animal Ethics 7 (2):198-203.
The Moral Complexities of Eating Meat.Ben Bramble & Bob Fischer (eds.) - 2015 - New York, US: Oxford University Press.
Strict Vegetarianism is Immoral.Donald W. Bruckner - 2015 - In Ben Bramble & Bob Fischer, The Moral Complexities of Eating Meat. New York, US: Oxford University Press. pp. 30-47.
Duty and the Beast: Should We Eat Meat in the Name of Animal Rights?Andy Lamey - 2019 - Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
The Case Against Meat.Ben Bramble - 2015 - In Ben Bramble & Bob Fischer, The Moral Complexities of Eating Meat. New York, US: Oxford University Press.
Nonculpably Ignorant Meat Eaters & Epistemically Unjust Meat Producers.C. E. Abbate - 2020 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 9 (9):46-54.
Save the Meat for Cats: Why It’s Wrong to Eat Roadkill.Cheryl Abbate & C. E. Abbate - 2019 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 32 (1):165-182.
Animals as Honorary Humans.Bob Fischer - 2018 - In Andrew Linzey & Clair Linzey, Ethical Vegetarianism and Veganism. Routledge.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-07-04

Downloads
61 (#363,736)

6 months
4 (#864,415)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andy Lamey
University of California, San Diego

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Utilitarianism: For and Against.J. J. C. Smart & Bernard Williams - 1973 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Bernard Williams.

Add more references