Paradoxes and Diagonalization

In Lampert Timm (ed.), Proceedings of the GAP Conference. Mentis. pp. 50-59 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper Richard’s Paradox and the Proof of Cantor’s Theorem are compared. It is argued that there is no conclusive reason to treat them differently such as to call the one a Paradox and the other a Proof.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,636

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-09-08

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Timm Lampert
Humboldt-University, Berlin

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references