Logically proper definite descriptions*. An essay in honor of Ruth Marcus

Dialectica 53 (3-4):271–282 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay notes a striking parallel between the original Hilbert‐Bernays treatment of definite descriptions and Russell's theory of logically proper names. The formal language for the original theory is laid out and the implications of a theory of vis a vis the statements that qualify as predications in a logically proper definite descriptions sense of the word ‘predication'different from the espoused by Frege, Russell and Meinong

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,597

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
39 (#580,768)

6 months
2 (#1,689,990)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Incomplete Symbols — Definite Descriptions Revisited.Norbert Gratzl - 2015 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 44 (5):489-506.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references